TotalFark is worth the money...

there's one website i actually pay money for - fark.com's pay site, TotalFark. comments in unposted links made by other TotalFarkers are comedy gold. some of the articles that don't get put on the main Fark page are also rather amusing...

a recent TotalFarker post (with the Survey tag) asks: TFer's ladyfriend claims that since women don't have prostates, it is not possible for them derive physical pleasure from backdoor lovin'. Is this true? Have all those movies been lying to us?

i think my favorite euphemism was: "Hitting it in the turd chopper" - yup, them TotalFarkers have quite a way with words...

dunno about the accuracy of this post, but it does make one wonder:

Related to the initial post, the anus and the mouth are analogues of one another, and have the same number of nerve endings. So, however pleasurable kissing is for you, is about how pleasurable anal stimultion is.

Also, in regards to the assumption that women have no prostate: this is techincally true. But, every organ in one gender's body has an anologue in the other in some form or another. All the cells that make up the organs that differentiate us are derived from the same gender-neutral embryonic stem cells. It's those washes of hormones while we're in the womb that differentiate us into one or the other gender (or get us caught in between and make a hermaphrodite).

From this site called "All About My Vagina": http://www.myvag.net/gspot/

I found this quote:
"When I first learned that the G-spot in females developed from the same embryonic tissue that would turn into the prostate in males, I was really intrigued. Embryonic stem tissue and analogous organs fascinated me for a few years. But I'm kind of over it. Maybe I'm just used to the idea that we're all built from versions of the same tissues."

/...And knowing's half the battle!

AT&T = American Telephone & Telegraph

funny link to a guy calling AT&T to get a telegraph installed...

bleargh...

pretty much sums up my mood right now.

irritating clichés...

one of those phrases that just gets under my skin is oft heard out of a weathercaster's mouth: "not a cloud in the sky" - that's supposed to be a good thing?!? sounds pretty fucking boring to me.

"not a cloud in the sky" - just one color, usually blue. i'll take some clouds, thanks...yeah yeah yeah, i know - clouds bring rain, yatta yatta yatta, but hey, a little variety every once in a while is a good thing...



think i may have weirded mom out a bit on our trip to costco this afternoon - i was just busy cloudwatching...okay, she has a right to get a bit freaky when i start gazing upward and just staring off into space, since usually that means i'll be convulsing at any given moment, but today i was just watching clouds as they passed by us and we passed by them...

some of the things i saw in the clouds this afternoon:

a mother cradling a child (everyone together now - awwwww...)

a warthog

a backwards question mark

a musical note - hell, i forget what it's called...
(aha - google sends me to a page that reaveals to me that it's a sixteenth note!)

a rubber ducky

Massachusetts

and finally, what has to be the weirdest and most unexpected vision:
joe kernan's eyebrows

(damn, i wish i'd had my camera with me then - you'd see 'em too!! the governor of indiana's damned eyebrows were in the clouds!!!)